For
something formed by the iron hand of physics, the universe has a lovely
aesthetic sense — its galaxies spiral, its novas explode, its nebuale spread
like great, sculpted clouds. For sheer cosmic delicacy, however, few things can
touch the planetary ring. Neptune has one, Uranus has one, and Saturn, of
course, has a braided, nested collection of them. Now, a less well-known ring
around an otherwise unremarkable star is providing a new way to find Earth-like
planets beyond our own solar system.
There
are three principal ways to detect exoplanets, each more challenging than the
other. There's direct detection, of course — spotting the distant world with
either a visible or infrared telescope. There's stellar occultation — watching
for the flicker of light from a star as a planet passes in front of it. This is
the method the Kepler space telescope has
used to detect more than 2,300 confirmed or suspected exoplanets. And there's
the even less direct gravitational wobble method: looking for the slight tug an
orbiting planet exerts on its parent star as it travels around it.
Now,
a report accepted for publication by Astrophysical Journal Letters
offers a fourth method, developed through observations of the nearby star
Formalhaut. In 2004, the Hubble Space telescope revealed that Formalhaut has a
large dust ring, thought to be a leftover from the formation of the star
itself, a mere 200 million years ago (our Sun, by contrast, is closer to 5
billion years old). When Hubble snapped a photo of the ring, it became clear
that the belt of dust had a surprisingly sharp inner edge. It was also
positioned somewhat assymetrically around the star, rather than perfectly
centered on it.
"The
best explanation," says Aaron Boley, a postdoctoral fellow at the
University of Florida and the lead author of the new paper, "was that a
planet was sculpting it." This is a well-known phenomenon in our own Solar
System, observes Eric Ford, a University of Florida astronomer who co-authored
the report. For example, he says, Uranus's epsilon ring is shepherded by two of
its moons, Cordelia and Ophelia, while Saturn's F-ring is held in place by the moons
Pandora and Prometheus.
Sure
enough, after a search with the Hubble by Berkeley astronomer Paul Kalas, the planet appeared to show up
as a glowing dot of light, estimated to weigh in at three times the mass of
Jupiter. That sighting turned out to be a mere illusion, however, after the
Spitzer Space Telescope took a look and found nothing
— something that shouldn't have happened since in this case, the Spitzer's
infrared eye would be more sensitive than the Hubble.
Still,
failing to prove the existence of a shepherding planet is not the same as disproving
it, so Boley and his colleagues decided to take a closer look, with the help of
the giant new Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) radio telescope
in the mountains of Chile. Though the telescope isn't in space, at more than
16,000 ft. (4,900 m) up, it's nearly as close as an Earth-based observatory can
get. The $1.3-billion, internationally funded ALMA will ultimately consist of
66 radio antennae, working in unison to simulate a single, gigantic dish. It's
still under construction though, so the astronomers used just 15.
That,
however, was more than enough to reveal that not only does the ring have a
sharp inner edge, but a sharp outer edge as well. "If there was just one
planet," says Boley, "how could this be?" It could be
happenstance, he says. "I don't like that explanation, but it's
possible." Another possibility is that a passing star happened to sharpen
the outer edge as it went by. "But that's really hard to do and keep the
ring as thin as it is." In the end, the team ran simulations to figure out
the most probable cause of the ring's tight shape. The conclusion: a Super
Earth, bigger than Earth but smaller than Neptune, on the inside of the ring,
and an object somewhere between the sizes of Earth and Mars on the outside.
Neither planet would be even close to visible with today's technology.
That's
not the end of the mystery, however. The ring itself is about 140 times as far
from Fomalhaut as Earth is from the Sun, which puts the inner world at about
120 times the Earth-Sun distance and the outer planet at about 150 or 160.
According to planetary-formation theory, though, it's hard to build planets at
such enormous distances (in our Solar System, Pluto swings between 30 and 50
times the Earth-Sun distance). So how did they get there?
As
it happens, theorists faced a similar problem when the first exoplanets were
discovered in the mid-1990's, except these were much too close to their stars.
The explanation they came up with: the planets interacted with the stars' disks
of dust and gas gravitationally, which forced them inward. The same sort of
interaction, says Boley, could have pushed these planets outward. But, he
cautions, "this is still an active area of research."
In
short, that explanation could turn out to be completely wrong, and some
dark-horse idea could still emerge. In exoplanetology, says Boley, "things
now seem possible that once seemed ridiculous." And given how young the
science is, that trend is likely to continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment